Site menu:


April 2014 - Volume 20, Number 2


Click Here for a pdf version.



Increased Federal Aid to Iowa (and All States) is a Long-Term Trend

by Bob Williams and Joe Luppino-Esposito, State Budget Solutions

States receiving money from the federal government is unsurprising, but what is shocking is the states’ increased reliance on money from Washington, D.C., in the past decade. State Budget Solutions’ analysis of the latest data shows that, between 2001 and 2012, the percentage of general revenue dollars coming from the federal government increased in 41 states.


In all, states received $5.27 trillion from the federal government since the start of the 21st century. Since 2001, 34 states saw over 30 percent of all their collected general revenue come from the federal government.


The “stimulus bill” created a federal funding spike from 2009-2011, but the long-term trend of increased dependency on the federal government did not subside following the recession. This overall increase comes despite a change in the data by the United States Census Bureau that results in a lower, though more accurate, determination of how much federal revenue is given to states each year.


A state’s traditional political affiliation does not appear to impact response to the promise of funds from D.C. Both typically “red” and “blue” states have increased levels of support that are higher than a decade ago.


California accepted the most federal revenue over the period — $639 billion, though the state also had the highest total general revenue. In terms of percent of general fund revenue, Mississippi was the only state to have more than half of its revenue come from the federal government. The state surpassed the 50 percent mark in both 2007 and 2010.


Growing reliance on federal funding in state budgets is a dangerous trend. It threatens the financial stability of all 50 states, as well as the federal government. As federal debt skyrockets, Congress must look for ways to reduce spending. In the many states that count on the federal government for over one-third of their general revenue, every congressional spending reduction proposal puts the state at risk of a serious financial shortfall.


States must recognize that this funding arrangement also harms fiscal federalism. Federal funding usually comes with strings attached, and that means less chance for local control. When states cannot stand firmly on their own financial footing, they will lose the ability to make the best, locally based, independent decisions for their residents.


States need to act as independent and sovereign entities, which they are under the U.S. Constitution. In order to prepare for the next federal budget crisis, officials need to identify all the federal funds coming into their state and the cost of the mandates attached to the funding. States need to take a risk assessment similar to that done by the state of Utah, and each state legislature can and should develop a prioritized plan of action to act responsibly for their constituents.


The following table shows the State of Iowa, and how the amount of federal aid has increased from 28 percent in FY 2001 to over 33 percent in FY 2012, ranking 25th highest nationally.



Reprinted with the authors’ permission, March 26, 2014, <>. Bob Williams is President of State Budget Solutions. Joe Luppino-Esposito is Editor for State Budget Solutions.


FACTS & OPINIONS is one of our quarterly membership newsletters, arriving in January, April, July, and October. It consists of short articles of public interest with an emphasis on current issues.


FACTS & OPINIONS is published by Public Interest Institute at Iowa Wesleyan College, a nonpartisan, nonprofit, research and educational institute, whose activities are supported by contributions from private individuals, corporations, companies, and foundations. The Institute does not accept government grants.


Contributions are tax-deductible under sections 501(c)(3) and 170 of the Internal Revenue Code.


Permission to reprint or copy in whole or part is granted, provided a version of this credit line is used: "Reprinted by permission from FACTS & OPINIONS, a quarterly newsletter of Public Interest
Institute." The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Public Interest Institute.


If you have an article you believe is worth sharing, please send it to us. All or a portion of your article may be used. The articles in this publication are brought to you in the interest of a better-informed citizenry, because IDEAS DO MATTER.



All of our publications are available for sponsorship.  Sponsoring a publication is an excellent way for you to show your support of our efforts to defend liberty and define the proper role of government.  For more information, please contact Public Interest Institute at 319-385-3462 or e-mail us at