Site menu:


July 2013 - Volume 19, Number 3


Click Here for a pdf version.



Why We Need “Calm” Approach to Climate Change

By Tom Harris
Policy Advisor for Environment
The Heartland Institute

Last month, U.S. Representative David McKinley (R-WV) hosted an unbiased climate change panel discussion in Fairmont, West Virginia. Experts from both sides of the climate debate participated without restrictions of any kind.


McKinley’s open-minded approach is one that should be copied across the United States. Considering what’s at stake — a human-induced eco-collapse if former Vice President Al Gore and his allies are correct, or, if skeptics are right, a waste of billions of dollars and the loss of millions of jobs as we experiment with a switch away from hydrocarbon fuels to alternative energy sources — the risks are too high to do anything less.


No matter what Gore and founder Bill McKibben tell us, experts in the field know that climate science is highly immature. We are in a period of “negative discovery,” in that the more we learn about climate, the more we realize we do not know.


Rather than “remove the doubt,” as Gore tells us should be done, we must recognize the doubt in this, arguably the most complex science ever tackled.


The confidence expressed by Gore, McKibben, and President Barack Obama that mankind is definitely causing dangerous climate change is a consequence of a belief in what professors Chris Essex (University of Western Ontario) and Ross McKitrick (University of Guelph, Ontario) call the “Doctrine of Certainty.” This doctrine is “a collection of now familiar assertions about climate that are to be accepted without question” (Taken by Storm, 2007).


Essex and McKitrick explain, “But the Doctrine is not true. Each assertion is either manifestly false or the claim to know is false. Climate is one of the most challenging open problems in modern science. Some knowledgeable scientists believe that the climate problem can never be solved.”


Creating rational public policy in the face of such uncertainty is challenging. It is therefore important that America’s climate and energy experts are able to speak out without fear of retribution or sanction, regardless of their points of view. We want climate and energy policies to be based on rigorous science, economics and engineering, coupled with common sense and compassion for our fellow man, not political ideology or vested commercial interests.


Sadly, the exact opposite is the case today. Emotions run high as the climate debate has become intensely polarized. Implications of bias and vested financial interests, as well as logical fallacies (errors in reasoning), have taken the place of meaningful consideration of the facts. Many leading scientists therefore remain silent if their views are not politically correct.


We must clean up the climate change debate to make it easier for experts to participate. In particular, media and politicians should strive to avoid the logical fallacies that are distracting the public from thinking about the issue constructively.


Here are some of the fallacies that must be purged from the discussion:


• Ad Hominem (discredit the man, instead of the idea):


By calling those with whom he disagrees “climate deniers,” Gore commits a logical fallacy often used to equate those who question the causes of climate change with Holocaust deniers. No one is denying that climate changes; only the causes are in dispute.


• “Climate-change denier” is also a “thought-terminating cliché.”


• Guilt by association:


That a specific viewpoint is promoted by the “religious right” or the “loony left” is irrelevant. A position is either correct or not, or unknown, independent of the affiliations of the presenter.


• Straw man (arguments based on misrepresentation of an opponent’s position):


Republicans are not “anti-science.” Neither are Democrats. If they were, they would never fly in an airplane, use cellphones, or take vitamins. They simply disagree with each other about the causes of climate change. Climate always changes on planets with atmospheres.


We need politicians and media to help set the stage for an effective discussion of this, one of the most important issues of our time, by avoiding these logical traps. Representative McKinley has led the way. Let’s hope other leaders soon follow.


Originally published June 14, 2013, reprinted with permission of the Heartland Institute, <> accessed on June 15, 2013.

Tom Harris is Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition and Advisor for Environment Policy at The Heartland Institute. Along with Professor Bob Carter of James Cook University in Australia, Harris coordinated the open letter from 100 top climate experts to the Secretary General of the United Nations during the Bali Climate Change Conference in December 2007.


FACTS & OPINIONS is one of our quarterly membership newsletters, arriving in January, April, July, and October. It consists of short articles of public interest with an emphasis on current issues.


FACTS & OPINIONS is published by Public Interest Institute at Iowa Wesleyan College, a nonpartisan, nonprofit, research and educational institute, whose activities are supported by contributions from private individuals, corporations, companies, and foundations. The Institute does not accept government grants.


Contributions are tax-deductible under sections 501(c)(3) and 170 of the Internal Revenue Code.


Permission to reprint or copy in whole or part is granted, provided a version of this credit line is used: "Reprinted by permission from FACTS & OPINIONS, a quarterly newsletter of Public Interest
Institute." The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of Public Interest Institute.


If you have an article you believe is worth sharing, please send it to us. All or a portion of your article may be used. The articles in this publication are brought to you in the interest of a better-informed citizenry, because IDEAS DO MATTER.



All of our publications are available for sponsorship.  Sponsoring a publication is an excellent way for you to show your support of our efforts to defend liberty and define the proper role of government.  For more information, please contact Public Interest Institute at 319-385-3462 or e-mail us at