|
Of Public Interest
Volume 1, Number 3
December 1999
Freedom from Death Taxes is Good for
Everyone
by Richard E. Wagner
On 5 August 1999, Congress voted to repeal the federal death tax.
Unfortunately for all Americans, the President vetoed this repeal on 23
September. To be sure, one might wonder why the President’s veto was
unfortunate for everyone, as against being unfortunate for only a few. While the
tax rate starts at 37 percent and rises to 55 percent, it kicks in only when a
decedent’s estate reaches $650,000. The death tax would, on the surface, seem
to be paid by only the well-off, and not by ordinary folks.
The belief that the death tax affects only rich folks is as wrong as is the
ancient claim that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. The first
principle of taxation is that whatever is taxed will be supplied less fully by
those who are taxed. Moreover, the higher the tax the more that supply will
drop.
Death taxes are assessed against the wealth that people have accumulated
during their lifetimes. Most of this wealth has been accumulated through the
investment of savings in business enterprises of all kinds.
How much saving and investment takes place in a society depends on the return
that people think they can secure for their efforts. Whatever that return might
be, it will be reduced by death taxes. Higher death taxes mean that fewer new
enterprises are created, and those that are created are generally supported with
less capital than they would otherwise have been. Less capital to support
enterprising activities means, in turn, that fewer new jobs are created. It also
means that existing jobs will often pay less than otherwise, because increases
in capital generally make workers more productive and, hence, better paid.
To be sure, there are many things that people can do to reduce their
potential death tax. Estate planning has developed as a profession in good
measure to help people reduce the bite from death taxes. But this should not
make us feel any better about death taxes. According to a 1998 estimate of the
Joint Economic Committee of Congress, the amount of money that people spend
trying to navigate their way through death tax obstacles is roughly equal to the
$23 billion of revenue that death taxes raise.
In truth, death taxes may actually raise no revenue at all. While the IRS may
collect something like $23 billion from death tax filings, other tax revenues
are depressed by the death tax. With fewer enterprises formed and fewer jobs
created because of the death tax, personal income is lower. This means that
fewer revenues will be collected from taxes on payrolls and personal income.
Several studies have estimated that the reductions in these other sources of
revenue are roughly equal to the amount of revenues attributed to the death tax.
(A brief description of these studies can be found at www.house.gov/chriscox/deathtax/.)
This means that the death tax collects no revenue for government, but simply
substitutes one form of tax for another.
This substitution, however, comes at a high price. With less capital
investment in enterprises, both new and old, the pace of economic progress is
slowed and our competitive position in the international economy is weakened. We
all suffer, compared to where we could have been had we abolished the death tax
years ago. And we will continue to suffer in the future because of the President’s
veto of death tax abolition.
Moreover, just think what message the President’s affirmation of death
taxes sends to Americans. People become wealthy by investing their savings in
business enterprises. Creativity, enterprise, and frugality are the traits of a
progressive society. The death tax is a direct attack on those traits. By taxing
enterprise and frugality, the death tax promotes prodigality. After all,
glutinous expenditure on lavish consumption is a way of escaping the death tax.
Such forms of escape, however, undermine the progressive character of our
society and work to our detriment.
Dr. Richard E. Wagner is the Public Interest Institute's
Academic Advisory Board
Chairman and Holbert L. Harris Professor of Economics at George Mason
University.
Permission to
reprint or copy in whole or part is granted, provided a version of this
credit line is used: "Reprinted by permission from OF PUBLIC
INTEREST, a publication of Public Interest Institute."
The views expressed in this publication
are those of the author and not necessarily those of Public Interest Institute. They are brought to you in the interest of a
better-informed citizenry.
A Publication of:
Public Interest Institute at Iowa Wesleyan College
600 North Jackson Street
Mt. Pleasant, Iowa 52641-1328
Phone: 319-385-3462 Fax: 319-385-3799
E-Mail: public.interest.institute@limitedgovernment.org Web Site:
www.limitedgovernment.org
|